Concussion Conundrum: March 15 Villanova Law School Symposium

Our friends at the Villanova Law School's Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal have organized what will surely be a fascinating symposium on the "concussion conundrum." They have four panels of former professional athletes, doctors, lawyers, and journalists all exploring the numerous issues implicated by concussions in professional sports and the litigation involving the NFL. Click here for more details on and to register for  the symposium, which offers 2 CLE credits. Stay tuned for our series on the topic as well. The scheduled panels and panelists are:
 
 
Panel 1: Framing the Issue

The Symposium will begin with a conversation between Andrew Brandt and former athletes, including some that have taken strong and public positions about concussions in sports. Brandt and the players will discuss concussion awareness, prevention and treatment from their playing days as well as their view of the present environment.

  • Brian Westbrook, former  Philadelphia Eagles player
  • Keith Primeau, former Philadelphia Flyers player
  • Jim Nelson, former Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, Indianapolis Colts, and Baltimore Ravens player 
  • Taylor Twellman, former Major League Soccer player, current ESPN analyst and concussions commentator

Panel 2: Building the Case— A Legal and Medical Background of Concussions

This panel will explore liability issues of amateur and professional sports and bring a medical perspective to diagnosis and treatment of concussions.  It will also feature a perspective of a Villanova Law Student who has written about and experienced the effects of concussions in her and her family’s life.

  • Marc Edelman, Associate Professor of Law, Barry University
  • Dr. Michael Marino, MD, Attending Physician at Drucker Brain Injury Center
  • Cailyn Reilly, current student at Villanova University School of Law

Panel 3: Concussion Injury Litigation v. NFL: Looking at Both Sides

This panel will explore the key arguments of the case against the NFL featuring one of the lawyers representing the players, Sol Weiss, a class action defense lawyer and the founder of the definitive Internet site on concussion litigation.  It will be a balanced and in-depth look at the major issues of this key case in sports right now.

  • J. Gordon Cooney, Jr. Partner at Morgan Lewis, expert on the defense of class actions suits
  • Sol Weiss, Shareholder at Anapol Schwartz
  • Paul D. Anderson, Practicing attorney

Panel 4: What‘s Next?: Parents, Media, Administrators, and Scholars Look Ahead

This panel will feature media personalities such as Roger Cossack and Ashley Fox of ESPN who, along with Brandt, will look at the state of the sport of football in light of concussions, whether parents should let their kids play, and where the NFL will be in 20 years.

  • Roger Cossack, Legal Analyst, ESPN / CNN
  • Ashley Fox, NFL Columnist, ESPN
  • Peter Keating, Senior Writer, ESPN Magazine
  • Taylor Twellman, ESPN Soccer Analyst

WHY IT IS BAD WHEN BROTHERS FACE OFF THANK GOD THAT MY BROTHER IS NOT A LAWYER

By Jeffrey S. Kravitz, Esquire

Let's start with the obvious...the Harbaugh Bros. (Jim and John of the 49ers and Ravens respectively) are going to say that it makes no difference to them that their brother is their opponent. Over and over again….Right.

Now let's get up close and personal. When I got into law school, my parents were pleased. When my brother got into med school you would have thought that the Red Sea had parted again.

Turnabout is fair play. I am the older. Having the Kravitz name in Long Beach California was a rarity. Thus, when my brother would start class throughout childhood, the teacher would say, "Are you Jeff's brother?" He was both pleased…and not. Capper was when he went to England for his junior year abroad. His visiting professor had him over to dinner in London as she was on sabbatical, as was her husband, a professor at UCLA. Five minutes into dinner, he looked at my brother and questioned, "Are you related to Jeff Kravitz?" My brother called from London at two in the morning my time and without introducing himself proclaimed," You son of a ..... I am thousands of miles away and cannot get from under your shadow!" Let the sibling wars begin. 

DEATH OF A FOOTBALL PLAYER

By Jeffrey S. Kravitz, Esquire

Jovan Belcher had his whole life ahead of him and now he and his girlfriend are gone. According to the Daily News, he kissed the corpse after he shot her, before killing himself. Law allows us to grow as we grow old. Athletics often rob us of that luxury. As immortalized in poetry:

The time you won your town the race
We chaired you through the market-place;
Man and boy stood cheering by,
And home we brought you shoulder-high.

To-day, the road all runners come,
Shoulder-high we bring you home,
And set you at your threshold down,
Townsman of a stiller town.

Smart lad, to slip betimes away
From fields were glory does not stay
And early though the laurel grows
It withers quicker than the rose.

Eyes the shady night has shut
Cannot see the record cut,
And silence sounds no worse than cheers
After earth has stopped the ears:

Now you will not swell the rout
Of lads that wore their honours out,
Runners whom renown outran
And the name died before the man.

So set, before its echoes fade,
The fleet foot on the sill of shade,
And hold to the low lintel up
The still-defended challenge-cup.

And round that early-laurelled head
Will flock to gaze the strengthless dead,
And find unwithered on its curls
The garland briefer than a girl's.

From: To An Athlete Dying Young by A.E. Housman

NFL Player's Trouble Demonstrates that "Family Law" Means More than Just Divorce

By Aaron D. Weems, Esq.

Editor of Pennsylvania Family Law Blog

 

The stereotype of a family law attorney is that they deal in divorces or are limited to issues between spouses. The reality is that the practice can be far reaching in scope and encompass estate planning issues, business interests, and matters that extend beyond ex-spouses, but that deal with many aspects of a client’s life.  A recent example of how the term “family law” can truly encompass the entire family made news recently in the form of the legal action NFL rookie offensive lineman Tyron Smith had to take against members of his family. Mr. Smith found himself at odds with family members who allegedly had become so aggressive in their demands for money that he had to call the police to intervene. Mr. Smith’s representatives report that about $1 million is missing from him.

Mr. Smith plays tackle for the Dallas Cowboys. While in southeastern Pennsylvania that job description may not get him much sympathy, I think everyone can at least understand and appreciate why a young man who is (allegedly) missing $1,000,000.00 would need to establish some secure boundaries between his family and his money. An NFL player’s career is short; don’t confuse the small number of higher profile long-term players for the general rank-and-file of the NFL. The fortunate ones may play an average of three years; some never make it past their rookie contract or, for that matter, rookie training camp. Mr. Smith, under the NFL’s new collective bargaining agreement, is extremely well-paid, albeit not as well-compensated as his predecessors, many of whom has gone on to financial ruin due to family situations not unlike his.

As reported by Kareem Copeland of www.NFL.com, subsequent reports have come out about the facts behind Mr. Smith’s call to the police and his family disputes there was a disagreement about money (while acknowledging that he has given them a sizable portion of his four-year, $12.5 million contract). Nevertheless, Mr. Smith clearly reached a point where he could not trust those closest to him and had to act out of self-interest to protect himself and his financial stability.

 

Photograph by: Neon Tommy

Photograph by: Neon Tommy

 

Andrew Brandt, who has the distinction of having served on both sides of the NFL bargaining table as an agent and executive with the Green Bay Packers, wrote an interesting account of his experience with young players in similar situations as Mr. Smith. He has experienced the difficulty of counseling a client to act in a way that may hurt – emotionally or financially – someone they love, but sometimes that is a consequence of protecting the client.

Tyron Smith’s experience is not exclusive to wealthy athletes; many people find themselves in situations of having to seek judicial intervention in the form of Protection from Abuse Petitions, evictions, or needing counsel to resolve a financial issue in Orphan’s Court. Mr. Smith clearly found himself in a situation in which he had to consider what legal protections were available to him in order to secure his future. While Tyron Smith’s athletic career may be long, his post-NFL life will be much longer and – whether his actions prove to have been justified or a misunderstanding – he should commended for not waiting until his playing days and money ran out before doing something to protect both.

NFL Referees All Set to Magically Disappear

By Jeffrey S. Kravitz and Sekou Campbell

According to the Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press, the NFL has reached a tentative agreement to end its lockout of the referees. 

 

Ed Hochuli, whom Jeff Kravitz has worked with (as a lawyer not a ref), reads “Rules. Lots of Rules.” This year, during the lockout, Hochuli even held a boot camp during the NFLRA’s negotiations with the NFL. So, the professional officials will likely be ready when they return tonight to don the zebra stripes in the Ravens v. Browns game. The NFL no doubt values its referees, but this labor dispute begs a larger question: How does a sports league, worth billions of dollars, valuate referees in the marketplace?

 

 

Referee valuation poses a set of issues distinct even from player strikes or lockouts because referees gain value when they lose prominence. When a referee or umpire calls a “perfect” game, they rarely do or should get mentioned.  Their “invisibility,” however, challenges their sports league employers to come up with a workable economic model for their market. Perhaps sports leagues now have the information they need to appropriately evaluate the market strength of invisibility.

 

Substitute Referees and Good Judges

By Jeffrey S. Kravitz, Esq.

The NFL is clearly struggling with substitute referees. Over the weekend, one such was removed from a New Orleans Saints game because he was a Saints fan. CBS Morning News today featured the controversy and the outcry re the integrity of the game.Same with judges. It is axiomatic that good judges make better decisions overall than bad ones. In California, the state judiciary is struggling with severe budget cutbacks. All suffer. I sat through four hours of court time as a judge was forced to do a double law and motion schedule due to furlough days. He performed heroically, but the State has to come up with more money for the courts to ensure the integrity of the process.


  

The National Football League and Workers' Compensation

By Jeffrey S. Kravitz, Esq.
 
Workers' Compensation is something of a wackadoodle system. Originally designed by Otto von Bismarck in Germany, it was designed to provide compensation to injured workers without clogging the courts with lawsuits where negligence or more would need to be proven. It works reasonably well and like politics and sausage, it is not pretty to watch being made. Years ago, applicants' attorneys used to go out with the workers' compensation judges for coffee or drinks on a regular basis.
 
My UCLA classmate and later legislator Burt Margolin, engineered a series of reforms that helped eliminate some of the trappings of bias.  The system is still loaded toward the injured worker and thinkers above  my pay grade have opined that it is a necessary plank in an industrialized society.
 
 
Hall of Fame football player Bruce Matthews filed suit in California for comp benefits despite the fact that his career was with the Tennessee Titans. In an opinion appearing at Matthews v. Nat. Football League Mgm't Council, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3156430; and commented upon in the August 13 issue of Sports Business Journal the appellate court upheld an order by an arbitrator prohibiting Matthews from filing a workers' comp claim in California. The reasoning was that he had a contract that specifically provided for only suing for comp in Tennessee, and the court had no problem upholding the contract absent a showing that he suffered a discrete injury in a game in California. Matthews argued that every game contributed to his physical injury, but the court was not buying that kvetch. While the Ninth Circuit is thought of as liberal and at least two of the judges who heard the matter, likewise, ultimately the Court felt that the contract did not offend sensibilities, where there was no injury in California. Moreover, the prospect of every retired football player filing here would not have been welcome. Touchdown for the League on this one.

Be Yourself, but Be Your Best Self

Tim Tebow was a huge college quarterback, projected for failure in the NFL. Instead, he is winning. He is hallelujah, not hip hop, square, not cool, thankful, not thankless. Lesson here: be yourself. One of the biggest (actually quite short) trial lawyers in LA during my pup days was a short guy, with a Radar O'Reilly look (from Mash), who had a courtly Southern  presentation, rather than cut and slash. Motto once again: be yourself, but be your best self.

                              

photo credit: Caveit Calcei

Congress and the NFL

As detailed by Chad Pergram in his FoxNews.com article dated March 4, 2011, Debate on Spending: “The Conversation Will Continue,” there are ongoing talks in Congress re budget cuts, but nobody is talking.  The Speaker deferred to the Vice President and Mr. Biden was (gasp) noticeably mum and brief.  

Ditto the NFL, which has a news blackout effectively and, like Congress, is extending existing agreements (or in the case of Congress, the debt threshold).  Famously, Winston Churchill said that one should not watch either government or sausage being made, and Obamacare suffered from too much attention (in my view).  Kudos to both Congress and the NFL for keeping their mouths shut.  Not everything needs to be breathlessly watched on CNN, Mr. Sheen.

As We Enter the New Year

As featured in BusinessWeek.com on December 30, 2010, the question looming over the NFL playoffs is the possibility of a strike next season. The players' union has estimated the cost of such a strike at $160 million and has written the nation's governors and mayors regarding this potential loss.

What goes unstated is whether either side has strike insurance to "share the wealth" with carriers, foreign or domestic. This writer worked on the baseball strike of '88, which was insured in part. The insurers in turned reinsured the risk through other carriers. Reinsurance is basically a side bet by the insurer with another company so that the entire risk does not fall on one carrier or underwriting group. Insurance law and reinsurance law is basically the law of contracts with a heavy dose of public policy thrown in.

 

So when the figure of $160 million is used, the question becomes, who will bear the ultimate risk?

Who's Side Are You On?

This is the title of an old labor song made famous by Woodie Guthrie. This came up as a topic over turkey day in Texas because NFL contracts are not guaranteed (except for bonuses) while those in other sports are largely guaranteed. The assembled, a fairly conservative group, wanted to keep it that way, concerned that their ticket prices not go up. Concern for injured workers was sorely lacking. With all of the recent publicity on concussions, look for the NFL to work toward some sort of compensation to injured players, thus improving their self-image and providing a more just system.

NFL Players Feel Left Out of Deals with TV Networks

In "NFLPA Files Complaint Against NFL Over Television Deals", SI.com deals with the issue of the NFL players vs owners in the event of a lockout or strike.  Seems the owners have more protection than the players and players are crying foul.  A longtime agreement requires the owners to try to maximize revenue to the players and the players feel that the covenant of good faith and fair dealing has been broken.  Every contract has an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in California, which is basically the Golden Rule.  Much commentary from the players on this one and none from the owners.  Will be interesting to see their reply and we will be following.

Ben Roethlisberger's NFL Suspension Could Have Been Avoided by Steelers

On ESPN's "The Herd" on April 21, 2010, the host talked about the NFL doing the hard parenting on Ben R.  One would hope that the NFL would not have to parent adults getting millions, but that is not the world we live in.  A simple suggestion by analogy: California sexual harassment law.

In California, employers who employ a certain number of employees have to give their employees and supervisors training each year in sexual harassment.  The California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") requires that employers with 50 or more employees provide all supervisory employees (including executives, managers and lead employees), with sexual harassment training once every two years.  Where the employer fails to provide the training, a plaintiff who sues for sexual harassment can claim that the employer failed to take reasonable steps to prevent and correct sexual harassment in the workplace, which can lend support to a request for a punitive damages award.

 

Regardless of whether California teams are presently including their players in this exercise, the NFL or the teams should provide their players with similar instructions. This type of training could help avoid improper behavior by players. 

Trademark Law and the Saints

As most of you know, the Saints fans yell, scream, text and twitter the line... "Who Dat" and have for years. As illuminated on the pout, the National Football League is trying to end the sale of shirts and ancillaries featuring the expression, claiming ownership of it. The online report fails to mention whether the league has registered the mark and if so, the status of the mark before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Marks can be either registered or non-registered, but ownership in each case rests with first use in commerce. Everyone from the Louisiana senator to the local shopkeepers is claiming the cry as one of common origin, not in the public domain and not subject to ownership by the League. We have seen reports that the expression comes from an early jazz song, presumably not owned by the NFL.

 

Has the NFL raised an alarm only to have the owner of the song come forward and threaten the league?